METHODOLOGICAL ASPECTS OF ASSESSING THE HISTORICAL AND CULTURAL POTENTIAL OF TOURISM DEVELOPMENT IN CROSS-BORDER TERRITORIES (THE CASE OF THE CARPATHIAN EUROREGION)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32782/2786-5843/2026-2-9Keywords:
Carpathian Euroregion, cultural heritage, cross-border tourism, assessment methodology, GIS analysis, sustainable tourism, taxonomic indexAbstract
The relevance of the research: the cross-border territories of the Carpathian Euroregion concentrate a unique array of cultural heritage objects located in a multi-jurisdictional space of four states; however, most existing assessment methodologies are not adapted to the interstate dimension and do not account for cross-border accessibility, divergent national registers, or the requirements of the Carpathian Convention (2003). Subject of the research: the methodological foundations and criteria for a comprehensive assessment of historical and cultural heritage sites in cross-border territories under conditions of euroregional cooperation. The purpose of the study is to develop and test a multi-criteria weighted methodology for assessing the historical and cultural potential of the Carpathian Euroregion, integrated with GIS tools and the principles of the Sustainable Tourism Protocol (2011). Research methodology: systems approach, taxonomic analysis method (taxonomic development index by Sytnyk et al.), GIS modelling and isochrone-based transport accessibility analysis, participatory GIS mapping (PPGIS) tools, and registry database analysis following INSPIRE standards and Carpathian Heritage Inventory recommendations. The results of the study: a six-criteria weighted model was developed and tested on 127 heritage sites across four member states, yielding a four-level ranking scale and identifying 23 leading sites. Practical significance: results are applicable to cross-border route development, strategic tourism planning, EU funding applications, and joint UNESCO site protection programmes. Conclusions: the proposed methodology overcomes limitations of traditional approaches through the integration of cross-border context as an independent criterion and ensures data compatibility across different national registers. Prospects for further research: BIM and 3D scanning for digital twins of wooden architecture, intangible heritage assessment, replication in other Ukrainian euroregions.
References
Niewiadomski Z. The Carpathians as a region of international co-operation. Europa Regional, 12.2004(4), 168–172. URL: https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-48129-9
Lytvyn H., Tyushka A. Rethinking the Governance-Governmentality-Governability Nexus at the EU’s Eastern Frontiers: the Carpathian Euroregion 2.0 and the Future of EU-Ukrainian Cross-Border Cooperation. Eastern Journal of European Studies. 2020. Vol. 11 (Special Issue). P. 146–183. URL: https://ejes.uaic.ro/articles/EJES2020_11SI_LYT.pdf
Carpathian Convention. Framework Convention on the Protection and Sustainable Development of the Carpathians. Kyiv, 2003. URL: http://www.carpathianconvention.org/convention/framework-convention/
ANPED – Northern Alliance for Sustainability. Recommendations on Creating of the Carpathian Heritage Inventory. Carpathian Convention Secretariat, 2010. URL: http://www.carpathianconvention.org/tl_files/carpathiancon/Downloads/02%20Activities/2.1.7%20CHInventoryANPEDrecommendationsfinal.pdf
Carpathian Convention. Terms of Reference for the Working Group on Cultural Heritage and Traditional Knowledge. 2018. URL: http://www.carpathianconvention.org/tl_files/carpathiancon/Downloads/02%20Activities/2.1.7%20ToR%20WG%20Cultural%20heritage.pdf
Sytnyk N., Humeniuk V., Sych O. Taxonomic Analysis of the Development Level of the Carpathian Euroregion Territories. Journal of Settlements and Spatial Planning. 2020. Vol. 11. No. 1. P. 31–43. URL: https://geografie.ubbcluj.ro/ccau/jssp/arhiva_1_2020/04JSSP012020.pdf
Colucci E., Matrone F., Noardo F., Assumma V., Datola G., Appiotti F., Bottero M., Chiabrando F., Lombardi P., Migliorini M., Rinaldi E., Spanò A., Lingua A. Documenting Cultural Heritage in an INSPIRE-Based 3D GIS for Risk and Vulnerability Analysis. Journal of Cultural Heritage Management and Sustainable Development. 2022. Vol. 14. No. 2. P. 205–234. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JCHMSD-04-2021-0068
Marinescu E., Marinescu S., Popescu L. Mapping Pastoral Mobility: A Geospatial Inventory of Temporary Dwellings Within the Southern Carpathians. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information. 2025. Vol. 14. No. 12. Article 494. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi14120494
Carpathian Convention. Protocol on Sustainable Tourism to the Framework Convention on the Protection and Sustainable Development of the Carpathians. Bratislava, 2011. URL: http://www.carpathianconvention.org/convention/protocols/protocol-on-sustainable-tourism/
Carpathian Convention. Documentation of the Methodology on the Elaboration and Implementation of the Strategy for Sustainable Tourism Development. Vienna, 2018. URL: http://www.carpathianconvention.org/tl_files/carpathiancon/Downloads/02%20Activities/tourism/Methodology%20Developm_Implement_Carpath.TourismStrategy_ETE_092018.pdf
Bogdan S.M., Stupariu I., Andra-Topârceanu A., & Năstase I.I. Mapping social values for cultural ecosystem services in a mountain landscape in the Romanian Carpathians. Carpathian Journal of Earth and Environmental Sciences, 2019. 14(1), 199–208. https://doi.org/10.26471/cjees/2019/014/072
Howaniec H., Lis M. Euroregions and Local and Regional Development – Local Perceptions of Cross-Border Cooperation and Euroregions Based on the Euroregion Beskydy. Sustainability. 2020. Vol. 12. No. 18. P. 7834. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12187834
Культурні ресурси території Карпатського єврорегіону. Науково-аналітичне видання. Львів : ГО «Діалог», 2020. URL: https://dialog.lviv.ua/kulturni-resursi-teritoriyi-karpatskogo-yevroregionu/
Umweltbundesamt (Federal Environment Agency Austria). Good Practices of Sustainable Tourism in the Carpathians. Vienna, 2014. URL: https://www.umweltbundesamt.de/sites/default/files/good_tourism_carpathians_0.pdf
UNESCO World Heritage Centre. Ancient and Primeval Beech Forests of the Carpathians and Other Regions of Europe. 2017. URL: https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/1133/maps/
ICCROM; ICOMOS; IUCN. The Guidance and Toolkit for Impact Assessments in a World Heritage Context. Rome : ICCROM, 2022. URL: https://www.iccrom.org/sites/default/files/publications/2022-07/en_0_ia_guidance_world_heritage_iccrom_2022_web_0.pdf
Martinelli E., Gonçalves E., Castanho R., Pivac T. (Eds.). Cultural Heritage-Based Sustainable Tourism Approaches. Springer, 2025. URL: https://www.springerprofessional.de/cultural-heritage-based-sustainable-tourism-approaches/51732774




