MEMORIALIZATION AND WAR TOURISM: CONCEPT AND MECHANISMS OF INTERACTION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32782/2786-5843/2025-4-6Keywords:
memorialization, war tourism, commemoration, places of memory, memorial space, memory studies, post-conflict tourism, UkraineAbstract
The relevance of the study: in the context of the Russia–Ukraine war, the issue of preserving historical memory acquires particular significance. Memorial practices serve as a means of collective reflection on the past and as a factor shaping new forms of tourism. At the same time, the relationship between war tourism and memorialization processes requires a comprehensive scholarly interpretation. Subject of the study: the interaction between memorialization and war tourism as sociocultural phenomena that jointly form the space of war memory. Purpose of the study: to reveal the conceptual foundations for the formation of the war–tourism space by analyzing commemorative practices and identifying their role in creating “places of memory”. Methodology: the research applies system-structural and interdisciplinary approaches, methods of comparative, conceptual, and discursive analysis, as well as synthesis, induction, deduction, typological analysis, and scientific generalization. Research results: the essential features of commemoration and war tourism have been examined, and the key characteristics of contemporary memorial practices have been defined. The typological structure of war tourism and its correspondence with various memorial manifestations have been demonstrated. The principal instruments and forms of war memory have been identified. Scientific novelty: the relationship between commemoration and war tourism as interconnected sociocultural phenomena has been systematized and theoretically generalized. The main instruments and mechanisms linking war tourism and the culture of memory have been systematized. Practical significance: the obtained results can be applied in the development of conceptual and cartographic models of Ukraine’s war–memorial space, in the enhancement of educational programs in tourism studies, anthropology, and sociology, as well as in planning war-tourism routes and museum–memorial projects. Conclusions: the study confirms that commemoration is a significant factor in the development of war tourism, shaping a specific sociocultural space of war memory. It has been revealed that contemporary memorial practices are increasingly acquiring a hybrid character. Further research should focus on developing geospatial models of memory and interpreting local narratives within Ukraine’s context.
References
Nora P. Between Memory and History: Les Lieux de Mémoire. Representations, 1989. 26. P. 7–24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2928520
Huyssen A. Present Pasts: Urban Palimpsests and the Politics of Memory. Redwood City: Stanford University Press. 2003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781503620308
Mitchell K. Monuments, Memorials, and the Politics of Memory. Urban Geography, 2003. 24 (5). P. 442–459. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2747/0272-3638.24.5.442
Bell E., Taylor S. Vernacular mourning and corporate memorialization in framing the death of Steve Jobs. Organization, 2015. 23 (1). P. 114–132. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508415605109
Gibbs M., Meese J., Arnold M., Nansen B., Carter M. #Funeral and Instagram: death, social media, and platform vernacular. Information, Communication & Society, 2014. 18(3). P. 255–268. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2014.987152
Lee C. D. Memorialization through metaverse: new technologies for heritage education. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 2023. XLVIII-M-2-2023, P. 919–926. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-M-2-2023-919-2023
Scates B. Making the Memory Book: War-Time Loss and Memorialization through Ephemera. Genealogy, 2024. 8 (2), 64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/genealogy8020064
Романенко О. Війна і пам’ять: трансформація наративних меморіальних практик. Літературний процес: методологія, імена, тенденції. 2024. № 24: С. 114–122. DOI: https://doi.org/10.28925/2412-2475.2024.24.12
F. Sabila et al. IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci, 2024. 1301 012016. DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/1301/1/012016
Ibreck R. The politics of mourning: Survivor contributions to memorials in post-genocide Rwanda. Memory Studies, 2010. 3 (4). P. 330–343. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1750698010374921
Ryan C. (Ed.). Battlefield Tourism (1st ed.). Routledge. 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780080548340
Butler R., Suntikul, W. (Eds.). Tourism and War (1st ed.). Routledge. 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203107706
Щука Г. П., Несторишен І. В., Медвідь Л. І. До питання про розвиток воєнного (військового) туризму в Україні. Інфраструктура ринку. Електронний науково-практичний журнал. 2024. № 80. С. 209–213. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32782/infrastruct80-36
Eade J., Katić M. (Eds.). Military Pilgrimage and Battlefield Tourism: Commemorating the Dead (1st ed.). Routledge. 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315595436
Методичні рекомендації для місцевих громад щодо памʼятання учасників, жертв і подій російсько-української війни. URL: https://uinp.gov.ua/memorializaciya/metodychni-rekomendaciyi-dlyamiscevyh-gromad-shchodo-zberezhennya-i-vshanuvannya-pamyati-uchasnykiv-zhertv-i-podiy-rosiyskoukrayinskoyi-viyny (дата звернення: 05.11.2024).
Foucault M., Miskowiec J. Of Other Spaces. Diacritics, 1986. 16 (1). P. 22–27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/464648
Гуда А. Концептуальні аспекти воєнного туризму. Географічний часопис Волинського національного університету імені Лесі Українки. 2024. № 3 (3). С. 124–133. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32782/geochasvnu.2024.3.13
Interactive Cemetery & Memorial Map. American Battle Monuments Commission. URL: https://www.abmc.gov/cemeteries-memorials/cemeteries-memorials-map (дата звернення: 22.10.2025).
Battle for Jefferson. URL: https://battleforjefferson.com (дата звернення: 23.10.2025).
Anzac Day. URL: https://www.awm.gov.au/commemoration/anzac-day (дата звернення: 24.10.2025).






